基层政权的公共性建构:一个历史制度主义视角  

Public Construction of Grassroots Political Power:Based on the Perspective of Historical Institutionalism

作　　者：周庆智[1] ZHOU Qing-zhi(Institute of Political Science, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing 100028, China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院政治学研究所,北京100028

出　　处：《哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期2-7,共6页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"我国县级政府公共产品供给体制机制研究"(11AZZ006)

摘　　要：公共性贯穿于基层政权建设,有两层含义:一是关系政权存在的合法性,二是关系政权性质的社会基础。历史上看,现代政权建设和公共性建构未必具有内在的一致性,因为:把公共性作为实现国力强盛的手段,基层政权建设可以着眼于资源汲取和社会动员及控制能力,这必然构建与社会的支配和庇护关系;把公共性作为实现平等公民权的目的,基层政权建设只能着眼于社会公正和社会福祉的公共性质。所以,如何建构基层政权的公共性,涉及政治逻辑和权力性质的转变。换言之,关于基层政权建设的讨论,需要置于其公共性建构的历史发展逻辑和现实发展基础之上。Publicity runs through grassroots political power construction, of which includes two meanings. One is the legitimacy of the existence of political power, and the other is the social basis of the nature of political power. Historically speaking, the construction of modern political power and the construction of publicity may not have internal consistency. Because when publicity is taken as a means to achieve national strength, grassroots political power construction will be working on resources absorbency, social mobilization and con- trol, which will inevitably build a relationship of social dominance and asylum. When publicity is taken as a goal of realizing equal citizen rights, grassroots political power construction can only be working on the public nature of social justice and social welfare. Therefore the construction of grassroots political power involves the change of political logic and the nature of power. In other words, the discussion about the construction of grassroots political power needs to be based on the historical development logic and realistic development of its publicity construction.

关 键 词：基层政权建设 政府公共性 历史制度主义 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]