检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:温春泉[1]
出 处:《世界中医药》2017年第3期573-575,共3页World Chinese Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81101428)--虎杖苷通过抑制内在凋亡信号改善烧伤后血管通透性增高
摘 要:目的:与常规疗法比较,考察经中西医结合治疗方案对深度烧伤后残余创面治疗的临床效果。方法:选择2014年8月至2016年8月于我院就诊的68例深度烧伤后残余创面患者,随机分为2组,对照组经洗必泰溶液清洁创面后外涂磺胺嘧啶银霜,观察组经中药浸浴后给予中西药联合换药。比较2组疗效。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为97.1%,显著高于对照组(73.5%)(χ~2=8.039,P<0.05);观察组疼痛缓解优良率为76.5%,显著高于对照组(35.3%)(χ~2=11.102,P<0.05);观察组创面愈合时间为(13.2±3.4)d,愈合创面瘢痕发生率为17.6%,均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:深度烧伤后残余创面经中西医结合治疗方案可促进创面愈合,减轻伤口疼痛,控制创面生成愈合瘢痕,患者的预后良好。Objective:To observe the clinical effect of integrative Chinese and Western Medicine in treating residual wounds after deep bum. Methods : Selecting 68 cases of patients with residual wounds after deep burn who were treated in our hospital from Au- gust 2014-2016, then randomly divided them into two groups. The control group was given chlorhexidine solution after cleaning the wound which was coated with silver sulfadiazine cream; while the observation group was given western medicine combined with tra- ditional Chinese medicine bath dressing. To compare the efficacy of the two groups. Results :The total efficiency of the observation group was 97.1%, significantly higher than that of the control group (73.5%) (χ2 = 8. 039, P 〈 0. 05 ). Pain relief rate of the observation group was 76. 5% , significantly higher than that of the control group (35.3%) (χ2 = 11. 102, P 〈0.05). The wound healing duration of the observation group was ( 13.2 ±3.4)d, incidence rate of scar was 17.6% , significantly lower than that of the control group (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion: Integrative Chinese and western medicine can be effectively used in treating residual wounds after deep burn. It can accelerate healing, control scar formation and reduce pain. Also, the prognosis is great.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43