检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨月芳[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省建湖县人民医院院前急救科,江苏建湖224700
出 处:《中西医结合护理(中英文)》2017年第7期113-115,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
摘 要:目的探讨未湿化氧气经鼻吸入在院前急救工作中的应用可行性。方法 2016年1—12月建湖县人民医院救护车接诊并给予氧气吸入的患者400例,其中湿化吸氧的200例患者为对照组,未湿化吸氧的200例患者为观察组。观察2组鼻咽部不适、氧气异味感及其他不适情况,比较2组吸氧前后血氧饱和度(SpO_2)以及吸氧的操作时间。结果 2组吸氧过程中的不适反应比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组吸氧后SpO_2水平均得到提升,观察组吸氧操作时间短于对照组(P<0.05)。结论未湿化吸氧与湿化吸氧同样具有治疗意义且舒适度无差异,同时还能节省操作时间。Objective To evaluate the feasibility of non-humidified nasal cannula oxygen in pre-hospital emergency care. Methods Totally 400 patients with nasal cannula oxygen during pre-hospital emergency care were assigned into the observation group( n = 200,with non-humidified oxygenand the control group( n = 200,humidified oxygen). The nasopharynx discomfort,peculiar smell and other discomfort were observed. The changes in saturation of blood oxygen( SpO_2) before and after nasal cannula oxygen therapy,as well as its operation time,were recorded and compared between two groups. Results There was no significant difference in occurrence rate of discomfort reaction between two groups( P〈0. 05). The operation time of nasal cannula oxygen was shorter in the observation group than that of controls( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Non-humidified nasal cannula oxygen is an feasible way of emergency treatment,with same comfort as the humidified nasal cannula oxygen and could reducing operation time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28