检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司
出 处:《电子知识产权》2017年第7期84-90,共7页Electronics Intellectual Property
摘 要:比价插件服务提供者收集和整理商品的价格信息,通过比价插件向用户提供价格展示和比较服务,电商网站认为比价插件修改页面形式构成著作权侵权,向其他电商网站导流又构成不正当竞争。但电商网站商品页面不构成汇编作品,对页面的修改仅影响到单个用户,对网页代码的改进性修改构成合理使用,提供比价插件行为不构成著作权侵权;从《反不正当竞争法》角度,应当从行为正当性及电商网站交易机会损失、消费者利益等多方利益衡量进行分析,具体判断提供比价插件行为是否构成不正当竞争。提供中立性比价插件能够保障消费者知情权、增加消费者剩余,不违反《反不正当竞争法》。Price comparison plug-ins provide price display and comparison services to users by collecting and collatingprice information. E-commerce websites claim that price comparison plug-ins infringe their copyright because o f modifyingthe pages, moreover the behavior o f price comparison plug-ins is unfair competition. However, based on the basic principleso f copyright, the design o f the layout o f the website is lack o f originality, the product pages do not constitute a compilationwork, the modification o f the page code constitutes reasonable use, so price comparison plug-ins do not constitute copyrightinfringement. In perspective o f the act of legitimacy and loss o f trading opportunities, neutral price comparison plug-ins do notconstitute unfair competition. Price comparison plug-ins help to protect consumers the right to know, also increase consumersurplus. In the cognizance of unfair competition, consumers' interests should be considered as an important factor of judgment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30