检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨震宁[1] 赵红[1] 徐俪菁 YANG Zhen-ning ZHAO Hong XU Li-jing(Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, 100029, China)
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学国际商学院,北京100029
出 处:《经济管理》2017年第8期60-71,共12页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目"我国高技术企业通过跨国技术战略联盟进行多维'跨边界'学习与风险防御机制研究"(14BGL181);对外经济贸易大学研究生科研创新一般项目"资源知识属性;学习能力与合资企业控制权演进:跨案例研究"(76160601)
摘 要:本文通过对华为与摩托罗拉、中国第一汽车集团与德国大众汽车公司建立的两个跨国技术战略联盟进行跨案例比较研究和理论分析,建立了研究命题和理论框架。本文对案例的分析发现:(1)高技术企业形成战略联盟往往会因为涉及巨大利益而导致联盟存在内部风险;(2)跨国技术战略联盟中存在的隐性和显性障碍对于联盟稳定性有一定的影响;(3)资源共享型和资本分担型合作方式对于联盟稳定性的影响不同;(4)我国在建立跨国技术战略联盟的过程中,合作方式的选择和对联盟中存在的风险和障碍的识别很重要。With the rapid development of science and technology and the explosive growth of information, enter- prises in order to adapt to and maintain their own competitiveness choose the form of strategic alliance to cooperate, especially among the high-tech enterprises. Although the rapid development of technology strategic alliance to strengthen and consolidate the strength of enterprises, but the failure rate of alliance is high. The academic commu- nity is always concerned about the internal and external factors influencing the technological strategic alliance. Through the comparative study of cross-case and the theoretical analysis and discussion of two cross-national technological strategic alliances established by Huawei and Motorola, China FAW and Volkswagen, the author has established the research proposition and the theoretical framework. Through the in-depth analysis of the case, we found that: Firstly, the strategic alliance of technology is usually due to the great benefits of technology led to the existence of the risk of the Union. Cross-border technological strategic alliances between FAW and Volkswagen did not lead to opportunistic behavior because of mutual trust and prudent negotiations to establish norm. What' s more their respective strategic objectives have been achieved playing a supporting role on the stability of cross-border technological strategic alliance. And the strategic objectives between Huawei and Motorola are inconsistent. The each other is a potential competitive relationship. Intellectual property protection awareness is weak ,while loose alliance co- operation has played a negative role in the regulation,and ultimately which leads to Motorola make Opportunistic be- havior to cause the alliance to face the risk of cooperation. Secondly,the culture differences between FAW and Volk- swagen is relatively small, and mutual complementarity between resources and the government in the alliance giving strong support to reduce cooperation obstacles in the alliance, which has a positive eff
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.29