从维稳式治理到多中心治理:群体性冲突治理的困境、超越与重构  

Governance Model from Stability-maintaining to Polycentricity:Dilemma,Transcendence and Reconstruction of Governance of Mass Conflicts

作　　者：张庆彩[1,2] 董茜[3] 董军[1] 

机构地区：[1]合肥工业大学马克思主义学院,安徽合肥230009 [2]北京师范大学马克思主义学院,北京100875 [3]合肥工业大学党委离退休工作处,安徽合肥230009

出　　处：《学术界》2017年第7期175-184,共10页Academics

基　　金：教育部人文社科规划项目“环境型邻避冲突治理的政府责任及其实现机制研究”(15YJA810008);教育部人文社科规划项目“邻避冲突及其治理——基于环境正义视角”(13YJAZH014)阶段性成果

摘　　要：传统维稳式群体性冲突的治理模式,以政府为单一治理主体,采取封闭式决策与自上而下的宣教模式,以压制对抗、以权代法的思维处置冲突,压制了社会活力和公民自主性,难以满足公民意识觉醒、利益诉求日益多元化的需要。而花钱买平安、法不责众、妥协退让等息事宁人的维稳式治理,又强化了通过扩大事态、抗争获利的社会认知模式,使群体性冲突的治理陷入困境。超越困境,首先,借鉴多中心治理中的＂平等参与＂＂责任共担＂与＂利益共享＂理念,避免社会治理权力的政府垄断,建立一个多元主体平等参与、协商合作的治理体系。其次,从信息发布、利益协调、防范预警、及时回应与学习反馈等方面重构治理体系。最后,以激励与约束相匹配、权责利相统一为原则再造群体性冲突事件善治的实现机制。With the accelerating process of the rule of law,many law enforcement field still different degree of common problems in separation of law and practice.In the perspective of legal sociology,separation of law and the logic of practice,apresentation of the relevant laws with lower overhead on the actors,is behind the market profit coerced place the government,finally by 'endogenous'illegal'external illegal'to force to promote the separation of law and practice.To promote the law and practice of separation is the main reason for the cultural infiltration,imbalance of power structure under the evaluation mechanism,system structure under the unbalanced profit mechanism,social bottom upward flow is weak and the law the internalization of driving force factors led the limited system.

关 键 词：群体性冲突 维稳式治理 多中心治理 

分 类 号：D630[政治法律—政治学]