我国《商标法》第三十二条之在先权利保护研究——以“捕鱼达人”案为考察对象  

Research on Article 32 of Trademark Law of China Regarding the Protection of Prior Right: Taking the Case of “Fish Lord” as the Object

作　　者：冯晓青[1] 周贺微 Feng Xiaoqing(Civil, Commercial and Economic Law School, ZHOU Hewei China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《邵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期37-46,共10页Journal of Shaoyang University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"中国特色知识产权理论体系研究"(11AZD047)

摘　　要：我国《商标法》第三十二条对在先权利保护的规定,彰显了商标注册时应当为他人的在先权利保留一定空间的精神。在先权利的判断应当以在先权利相关法律为依据,完整的在先权利在商标法中应当受到保护和尊重。在先权利的成立基础不以商品功能为前提,商品功能不影响在先权利的正当性和完整性,仍应受《商标法》第三十二条在先权利保护。Article 32 of China Trademark Law expresses the protection of the prior rights, which implies that there should be spaces reserved for other kind of civil rights when people apply for a trademark registration. To identify a prior fight should be based on the law of the prior civil right, and a prior complete right in the trademark law should be protected and respected. The commodity function is not prerequisite for a prior right＇s integrity. And the commodity function does not affect the legitimacy and completeness of the prior right. The civil prior rights should still be protected by the right of Article 32 in China Trademark Law.

关 键 词：在先权利 著作权 外观设计专利 商标 知名度 

分 类 号：D923.43[政治法律—民商法学]