检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院,重庆401120
出 处:《中国卫生事业管理》2017年第7期481-484,共4页Chinese Health Service Management
基 金:重庆市科研创新项目"大数据视角下重大决策社会稳定风险评估的困境及其机制重构研究"(编号:CYS16111)
摘 要:中国改革开放前三十年里"效率优先于公平"的发展理念与模式严重破坏了卫生领域的公平,迫切需要转变中国卫生政策制定的治理模式,以求在符合公民利益基础上实现卫生资源分配公平。目前,中国卫生政策制定的治理模式仍停留在"作为结构的治理"及形式化的"作为过程的治理"阶段。文章进一步借助合理问责框架的公开、关联、修正、执行四条件来论证"作为过程的治理"比"作为结构的治理"更能体现程序公平,最后为转变中国卫生政策制定的治理模式提出三条路径。In the first thirty years of China' s reform and opening up, the development concept and model of "efficiency pri- ority" seriously undermine the fairness of the health field, need to change the governance model of China' s health policy formulation to achieve a fair distribution of health resources in line with the interests of citizens. At present, the governance model of health policy in China is still stuck in the "governance as a structure"and formalized "governance as a process". We further demonstrate that the "governance as a structure" is better than the "governance as a process" by mean of the public, the association, the a- mendment and the implementation. In the end, the article puts forward three ways to change the governance pattern of Chinese health policy.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.148.147