护理干预在补气行气活血润肠法治疗慢传输型便秘中的研究  

Study on nursing intervention in Qi-tonifying, Qi-promoting, blood-activating, and intestine-lubricating for slow transit constipation

作　　者：莫小兵 莫少卫[2] 苏丹[3] 任东林[3] 杨中权[2] 林友彬[2] 

机构地区：[1]佛山市禅城区朝阳医院肠镜室,528000 [2]佛山市中医院肛肠科,528000 [3]中山大学附属第六医院肛肠科,广州510000

出　　处：《国际医药卫生导报》2017年第15期2383-2386,共4页International Medicine and Health Guidance News

基　　金：佛山市科技局攻关项目（2014AB00327）

摘　　要：目的观察评价优质综合护理干预措施在补气行气活血润肠法治疗慢传输型便秘（STC）中的应用效果。方法将66例经补气行气活血润肠法治疗慢传输型便秘患者按照数字表法随机分为对照组与观察组，各33例。对照组给予常规护理；观察组则在对照组基础上给予优质护理干预，并比较两组护理效果。结果观察组护理干预前QOL各项评分与对照组比较，差异无统计学意义（均P〉0．05）；观察组护理干预后QOL各项评分明显高于对照组（均P〈0．05）。观察组护理满意度为96．97％，咀显高于对照组的81．82％（χ^2=3．9952，P〈0．05）。结论优质护理干预对经补气行气活血润肠法治疗慢传输型便秘患者，能够有效提高患者的生活质量及患者对护理满意度，值得临床大力推广应用。Objective To evaluate the effect of high-quality comprehensive nursing intervention in Qi- tonifying, Qi-promoting, blood-activating, and intestine-lubricating for slow transit constipation （STC）. Methods Sixty-six patients with STC treated by Qi-tonifying, Qi-promoting, blood-activating, and intestine-lubricating were randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using digital table method, 33 for each group. The control group were routinely cared; in addition, the observation group were given high-quality nursing intervention. The nursing effects were compared between these two groups. Results There were no statistical differences in the scores of QOL before the intervention （ all P 〉 0.05） but were after （all P 〈 0.05） between the observation group and the control group. The satisfaction rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group （96.97% vs. 81.82%, χ^2=3.995 2, P 〈 0.05）. Conclusions High-quality nursing intervention in Qi-tonifying, Qi-promoting, blood-activating, and intestine-lubricating for slow transit constipation can improve the quality of life and patients＇ satisfaction of nursing care, so it is worth being clinically generalized.

关 键 词：慢传输型便秘 补气行气活血润肠法 优质护理干预 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]