风险与安全:“PX”议题报道中专家话语分析  

Risk and Security:Expert Discourse Analysis in the Issue of "PX"

作　　者：岳丽媛[1] 张增一[1] YUE Li - yuan ZHANG Zeng - yi(School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijlng, 100049, China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学院大学人文学院,北京100049

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2017年第8期45-50,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"争议性科技议题的公众参与科学传播研究"(项目编号:16CXW018)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：近十年来,国内"PX"项目频频见诸于报端,成为饱受争议的对象,甚至引发了多起群体性事件。在一些普通民众心目中,"PX"不再是对二甲苯这个化工名词,而是"剧毒"和"危险"的代名词。究竟"PX"项目暗藏巨大风险,还是安全可靠?专家对此发表怎样的见解?有何判断?从报纸中的专家话语文本入手,尝试采用詹姆斯·保罗·吉(James Paul Gee)的综合话语分析法来考察"反PX派"和"挺PX派"专家是如何实现话语建构任务的,指出"专家共同体"内部的话语之争对PX形象的建构作用,并通过分析、对比专家话语"修辞建构"的实践逻辑,结合文本产生的具体情景,探索话语背后的社会影响因素。Over the past decade, the domestic PX projects frequently appeared in the newspapers, continuing to cause controversies, even triggered a num- ber of mass incidents. To ordinary people, ＂ FX＂ is no longer the chemical terms of p-xylene, but the synonymous with ＂toxic＂ and ＂dangerous＂. Wheth- er the PX project is a huge risk, or safe and reliable？ What kind of opinions had experts expressed？ How did they judge？ Based on the texts of the experts in the newspaper, James Paul Gee＇s comprehensive discourse analysis method is adopted to examine how did the experts achieve discourse construction tasks and point out the role of expert discourse in the construction of PX image. The practical logic of the ＂rhetorical construction＂ of the expert discourse were analyzed and compared. And the social factors behind the discourse were explored,combined with the social background behind the texts.

关 键 词：PX 风险 争议 专家话语 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]