善:张弛于有序与无序之间——对一种简单以熵量为判据的荒诞伦理学的批判  

Good:Relaxation between Order and Disorder——A Critique of an Absurd Ethics simply Using the Size of Entropy as Criterion

作　　者：邬焜[1] 王健[1] WU Kun WANG Jian(International Center for Philosophy of Information,Xi~n Jiaotong University, Xi~n 710049, China)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学人文社会科学学院,陕西西安710049

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2017年第8期108-113,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：2013年度国家社会科学基金重点项目"信息哲学的基础理论研究"(13AZD096)

摘　　要：弗洛里迪仅仅以熵量多少来评判善恶的伦理原则是建立在简单性和单极化思维方式的基础之上的。如果按照他所制定的对熵的绝对排斥的至善原则来实践的话,那么,在自然界和生物圈领域只能导致运动变化活力的终结,在人的思想和科学发展的领域只能导致僵化和停滞,在社会领域则只能导致法西斯式的专制集权体制。事物的有序化和无序化发展都是有极限的,熵和熵增并不就是绝对的"恶",信息和熵减也并不就是绝对的"善"。一个合理的伦理原则应当把诸如信息和熵、有序和无序、整体性和还原性、确定性和非确定性、决定论和非决定论、目的性和随机性、必然性和偶然性这些看似对立的因素兼容起来,并在这些相关对立因素之间保持某种合理的张力。The moral principle that Mr. Floridi merely judges the Good and Evil with the amount of entropy is based on the simplicity and unipolar way of thinking. If practicing in accordance with his principle of Goodness that absolutely excluding entropy, then, in the field of nature and biology can only lead to the end of the dynamic changes, in the field of human mind and scientific development can only lead to rigid and stagnant, in the social field can only lead to fascist autocratic centralization system. The orderly and disorderly development of things have those limits, entropy and entropy increase is not absolute ＂ Evil＂ , information and entropy reduction is not absolutely ＂ Good＂. A reasonable ethical principle should reconcile opposing factors, such as information and entropy, orderly and disorder, integrity and reducibility, certainty and non- determinism, determinism and non- determinism, purpose and randomness, inevitability and contingency, and maintain a reasonable tension between these opposing factors.

关 键 词：价值 伦理 熵 信息 善 恶 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]