农民专业合作社的真伪之争:分歧的焦点与原因  

The Summary and Discussion on the Authenticity of Farmers' Professional Cooperatives

作　　者：刘骏[1] 张颖聪[1] 艾靓[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学政治与行政学院,武汉430063

出　　处：《农业经济问题》2017年第7期16-23,共8页Issues in Agricultural Economy

基　　金：湖北省社会科学基金项目"湖北典型地区农村劳动力代际变迁与土地利用状况及趋势研究"(编号:2014234);国家社会科学基金项目"政治文化视域下村庄治理机制研究"(编号:13czz042)

摘　　要：随着我国农民专业合作社数量的快速增长,其规范发展的问题日益引起各界的关注。其中对合作社真伪的判断存在两种不同的呼声,一是认为目前大多数合作社是伪合作社,一是认为大多数合作社只是不太规范。在两种呼声的背后,还隐藏着合作社发展路径的分歧。通过对两种不同观点的归纳与探讨发现,它们之间分歧的原因在于"实用—法理"和"一元功能—多元功能"的二元取向。尽管如此,还是可以看到两种观点之间存在可以调和的可能,但要从根本上进行调和,需要在理论上提供一套分析范式,在实践上提供切实可行的制度框架。With the rapid growth of the number of farmers' professional cooperatives in China,the standard development problem of farmers ' professional cooperatives got all circles ' attention. There are two kinds of judgments on the authenticity of cooperatives. One supports that most of the current cooperatives are pseudo cooperatives. The other supports that most of cooperatives are just less standardized. Behind the two voices,there also hide the differences of cooperatives development path. Through the summary and Discussion of two different views,we find the reason why they difference from each other is the two elements orientation: 'practical-legal'and' single function-multiple function'. In spite of this,it is also possible to reconcile the two views. Nevertheless,if we want to reconcile it essentially,there should provide a set of analytical paradigm in theory and a practical system framework in practice.

关 键 词：农民专业合作社 合作社法 “一人一票”制 盈余按交易额返还 

分 类 号：F321.42[经济管理—产业经济]