检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈卫东[1]
出 处:《法学杂志》2017年第8期31-41,共11页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:自党的十八届三中全会提出"改革审判委员会制度,完善主审法官、合议庭办案责任制,让审理者裁判,由裁判者负责"的司法责任制改革以来,推进司法责任制改革就成为司法改革的一项重要内容,中央有关部门及最高人民法院相继推出了一系列改革举措。对于如何推进司法责任制改革,理论上有不同的认识,实践中也有一些误区。本文对司法权的主体、审判责任的概念与设置原则、审判责任的构成要件与豁免条件、错案追究的主体和程序、审判权的监督与制约问题进行了探讨,以期有裨益于当前推进的司法责任制改革。Since the Third Plenary Session of the 18 th Central Committee of the CPC put forward the reform of judicial responsibility system about "Reform the system of the Judicial Committee,improve the responsibility system of trial judge and collegial panel,let the judge referee,by the referee responsible",promoting the reform of judicial responsibility system has become an important part of judicial reform,and the central authorities and the Supreme People 's Court have launched a series of reform initiatives. For how to promote the judicial responsibility system reform,there are different perceptions in theory and misunderstanding in practice. This paper intends to explore the issue in order to benefit the promoting current judicial responsibility reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145