检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王俪睿 沙万中[1] WANG Lirui SHA Wanzhong(Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou 730070, Chin)
出 处:《中国公共安全(学术版)》2017年第3期108-111,共4页China Public Security(Academy Edition)
摘 要:近年,随着我国司法体制的逐步完善,听证制度除了在立法工作和行政处罚上有了规范的体现,在鉴定领域中也有初步的运用和发展。司法鉴定引入听证制度有效解决了一些争议案件,改善了司法鉴定现存的问题,为实现司法公正和社会稳定提供了途径。本文通过分析听证制度在我国司法鉴定的应用情况,结合司法体制现状,说明实施司法鉴定听证制度的必要性和可行性,提出听证制度在我国司法鉴定应用的具体操作规范及建议,进一步树立鉴定权威,提高鉴定程序的透明度及鉴定意见的科学性。In recent years, with gradually improving of Chinese judicial system, the hearing system has its own normative expression in the legislative work and the administrative penalty, and also has preliminary application and development in the field of judicial appraisal. The judicial appraisal hearing system has effectively solved some controversial cases, improved the existing problems of judicial identification, and provided a way for the realization of judicial justice and social stability. In this paper, through the analysis of the application of the hearing system in Chinese judicial authentication, combined with the present situation of the judicial system, it shows the necessity and feasibility of implementation of the judicial identification of hearing system, hearing system in our country, and puts forward the specific operation specification and Suggestions of the application of Hearing System in Judicial Appraisal to further establish the appraisal authority and improve the transparency of the appraisal procedure and scientific appraisal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117