检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑昌健[1] 郭文俊[1] 金孝岠[1] ZHENG Changjian GUO Wenjun JIN Xiaoju(Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical college, Wuhu 241001, China)
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院第一附属医院弋矶山医院麻醉科,安徽芜湖241001
出 处:《皖南医学院学报》2017年第4期385-388,共4页Journal of Wannan Medical College
基 金:皖南医学院中青年科研基金(F201427)
摘 要:目的:探讨骶管中应用右美托咪定(Dex)对小儿全麻苏醒期躁动(EA)的影响。方法:选择择期行腹股沟疝修补术的患儿160例,年龄2~6岁,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ,无椎管内麻醉禁忌证。随机分为4组:0.25%布比卡因组(C组、n=40)、0.5μg/kg Dex+0.25%左旋布比卡因组(Dex1组、n=40)、0.75μg/kg Dex+0.25%左旋布比卡因组(Dex2组、n=40)、1μg/kg Dex+0.25%左旋布比卡因组(Dex3组、n=40),药液总量为10 m L。全麻诱导置入喉罩后行骶管麻醉,4组药物30 s推入骶管。分别予麻醉诱导前(T_0)、置入喉罩后即刻(T_1)、手术开始后10 min(T_2)、拔除喉罩即刻(T_3)、拔管后10 min(T_4)、30 min(T_5)监测平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、手术时间、苏醒时间、阿托品使用情况、躁动发生情况。拔管后记录1 h、2 h的FLACC疼痛评分、Ramsay镇静评分。结果:4组患儿年龄、体质量、手术时间差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);T_0、T_1时刻,4组患儿HR、MAP无统计学意义(P>0.05)。T_2~T_5时刻,与C组相比,Dex2组、Dex3组HR、MAP明显下降(P<0.05)。与C组对比,Dex1组、Dex2组、Dex3组术后躁动发生率、术后疼痛明显减少(P<0.05),镇静水平明显增加(P<0.05)。结论:骶管应用Dex可减少小儿全麻苏醒期躁动发生率,具有镇静、镇痛作用,0.75μg/kg Dex不延长苏醒时间,同时心血管不良事件更少。Objective:To investigate the effects of caudal dexmedetomidine (Dex) on emergence agitation in children during postanesthetic recovery. Methods : A total of 160 children, aged 2 to 6 years ( ASA Ⅰ - Ⅱ), scheduled to undergo inguinal hernia repair without contraindications to spinal anesthesia, were randomized to receive 0.25% levobupivacaine ( group C, n = 40 ) , 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine + 0.25% levobupivacaine ( Dexl group, n = 40 ) , 0.75 μg/kg dexmedetomidine + 0.25% levobupivacaine ( Dex2 group, n = 40) , or 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine + 0.25% levobupivacaine ( Dex3 group, n = 40) .The total amount was set to 10mL.Anesthetic was injected into the sacral canal within 30 s after general anesthesia induction and laryngeal mask air- way (LMA) insertion. Mean arterial pressure ( MAP ), heart rate ( HR), operative time, recovery time, one hour and two hour FLACC scores, Ramsay scores after larygeal mask removal and incidence of postanesthetic excitement were documented at different time points, including pre-anesthetic induction ( T0 ), time of intubation ( T1 ) , 10 min after operation ( T2 ) , time of LMA removal ( T3 ) , 10 min after extubation ( T4 ) and 30 min ( T5 ) .Results : There was no significant difference regarding the age,weight,operative as well as changes of HR and MAP at To and T1 in the 4 groups(P〉0.05) ,yet HR and MAP were significantly fallen in Dex2 and Dex3 groups at between T2 and T5 compared to group C (P〈0.05).Children in Dex 1, Dex 2 and Dex 3 groups had lower incidence of postanesthetic excitement and postoperative pain than those in group C (P〈 0.05), and the sedation appeared better.Conclusion:Caudal dexmedetomidine may reduce the incidence of emergence agitation in children during postancsthetic recovery, and produce better sedation and pain control effects.Dosage of 0.75 μg/kg Dex will not prolong the recovery time or result in adverse cardiac events.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3