基于区域合作思维的跨界污染纠纷处理  

Transboundary Pollution Disputes Resolution Based on Regional Cooperation Thinking

作　　者：叶必丰[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海社会科学院法学研究所

出　　处：《法学家》2017年第4期67-76,共10页The Jurist

基　　金：中宣部"文化名家暨‘四个一批’"人才项目"区域法治协调研究"的阶段性成果

摘　　要：在中央与地方事权和财权分立的背景下,地方行政机关是辖区地方利益的主体,实施有关行政行为应符合正当程序,与相邻地方行政机关协商一致;对污染损害的单方面调查或委托鉴定涉嫌当自己案件的法官。法院在民事诉讼中应严格审查涉案行政行为和行政调查是否遵循了区域协商合作程序。法院自身应受区域合作规则的约束,需要进一步强化司法中立,在现行司法体制下应逐步完善管辖制度,真正平等对待双方当事人。Under the background of separation of central and local authority and financial power, local administrative organ is the subject of territorial interests. It must follow due process when making administrative actions and reach consensus with neighboring organs. To investigate pollution or damages or entrust identification unilaterally is suspected of being the judge in his own case. In civil procedures, courts shall strictly examine whether relevant administrative actions and investigations have followed regional consulting cooperation process. Except for being bound by regional cooperation rules, courts need to further strengthen judicial independence,gradually improve jurisdictional system under current judicial regime and equally treat both parties in litigation.

关 键 词：跨界污染纠纷 区域合作 司法中立 正当程序 

分 类 号：D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]