检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学国际医药商学院,江苏南京211198
出 处:《科技管理研究》2017年第15期170-178,共9页Science and Technology Management Research
摘 要:为更好地分析我国医药制造行业的集聚现状及创新水平,首先通过建立行业集聚、创新集聚、创新共聚三者间的理论框架,厘清三者间可能存在的逻辑关系;以我国医药制造企业的精准地理位置为基准数据,采用DO指数进行行业集聚、创新集聚及创新共聚水平测度。对比理论框架发现:除化学药品原药制造子行业发展较为成熟,其他子行业发展水平还有待提高,特别是中药饮片加工业和生物、生化制品制造业的整体创新水平还比较低下。To analyze the innovation and agglomeration level of Chinese pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, fi^tly, this paper establishes a theoretical framework of industrial agglomeration, innovation agglomeration and innovation copolymerization, and clarifies the possible logical relations between the three factors; then, based on the precise location of pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises in China, the DO indexes proposed by Duranton and Overman are applied to measure the level of industry agglomeration, innovation agglomeration and innovation copolymerization. Comparing the theoretical framework, we reach several conclusions: chemical medicine manufacturing industry is relatively mature, but the other studied industries require further development, among which the Chinese herbal medicine industry and biological, biochemical products manufacturing industry are with the lowest innovation level.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44