检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军第161医院康复理疗科,湖北武汉430000
出 处:《系统医学》2016年第9期12-13,16,共3页Systems Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨颈部康复训练操联合常规牵引治疗老年颈型颈椎病的疗效。方法选取68例于2015年5月—2016年5月期间该院接收的老年颈型颈椎病患者,随机分为对照组(常规牵引治疗)与实验组(颈部康复训练操联合常规牵引治疗),观察两组疗效。结果实验组较对照组临床有效率显著要高(P<0.05),分别为94.1%、64.7%;治疗后,两组CASCS评分、BBS评分、Barthel指数均升高,而实验组升高幅度更显著(P<0.05),治疗后实验组上述指标分别为(77.6±7.8)分、(78.6±6.6)分、(47.3±8.5)分,而对照组分别为(71.9±5.3)分、(57.3±6.4)分、(43.2±5.6)分。结论颈部康复操训练联合常规牵引治疗老年颈型颈椎病患者可取得显著疗效,具有推广价值。Objective To study the clinical effect of rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction in elderly pa-tients with cervical spondylopathy. Methods 68 elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy treated from May 2015 to May 2016 in our hospital were selected. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The control group adopted the conventional traction;the test group adopted the rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction. The clinical effi-cacy for two groups was observed. Results The clinical effective rate of test group was significantly higher than that of control group (P〈0.05)94.1% VS 64.7%; after treatment, the points of CASCS, BBS and Barthel index for test group were even higher than that of control group (P〈0.05). After treatment, the indexes of the experimental group were (77.6 ±7.8)points, (78.6 ±6.6)points, (47.3 ±8.5)points, and the control group (71.9 ±5.3)points, (57.3 ±6.4)points, (43.2 ± 5.6)points. Conclusion The rehabilitation exercises and conventional traction has an obvious effect in elderly patients with cervical spondylopathy. It is worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145