检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王灏 WANG Hao(Press of The China Legal Science Journal, Beijing 100081, China)
机构地区:[1]中国法学杂志社,北京100081
出 处:《浙江工商大学学报》2017年第4期48-58,共11页Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基 金:中国法学会部级法学研究课题"网络环境下个人信息权的民法保护"(CLS2013Y34-2)
摘 要:我国《侵权责任法》分则以及其它民事法律没有以特别条款的形式来规范过失侵权责任,因此确定过失侵权责任已经成为困扰我国司法工作者的难题。相较之下,普通法系侵权法中针对过失侵权确定的责任原则已经在司法实践中历经淬炼,并为判定有争议的过失侵权责任提供了相应的解决办法。相信对于普通法系过失侵权责任原则的实证研究将会为进一步理解和适用我国的《侵权责任法》提供帮助,文章因此尝试以普通法系侵权法为视角对过失侵权进行全面审视与论证。It is difficult for judicial practitioners to determine the liability of tort of negligence due to the fact that it has not been specially stipulated in the provisions of the Tort Liability Law or other civil laws and regulations in China. On the contrary,the principles of tort of negligence in common law legal system have been refined in judicial practice and provided the corresponding solution for determining the liability of tort of negligence. The author believes that the empirical research on the tort of negligence in common law legal system will help us to further strengthen the understanding and application of the Tort Liability Law in China. This article thus comprehensively surveys and researches the tort of negligence from the perspective of common law legal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49