检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国药事》2017年第8期887-893,共7页Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs
摘 要:目的:对比化妆品和化学药品标准体系并对二者的检验特点进行分析,为药品检验机构开展化妆品检验工作提供参考。方法:从检验标准体系、检验项目、检验方法、结果判定4方面,总结化妆品、化学药品检验的各自特点。结果与结论:化妆品和化学药品有各自的产品属性,二者的标准体系和检验方法具有不同的特点:药品检验标准为专用标准,针对性强,药品有效成分的检验多为常量分析;化妆品检验标准为通用标准,化妆品禁限用物质的检验多为微量或痕量分析。Objective: To provide references for the drug control institutes to carry out cosmetics testing work by comparing testing standard systems of cosmetics and chemical drug as well as their respective characteristics. Methods: To summarize the characteristics of the cosmetic and chemical drug test from 4 aspects, standard testing system, testing items, testing method and the result judgment. Results and Conclusion: Cosmetics and chemical drugs have their distinctive product features, and their standard system and testing method are different from each other. The standards for drug tests are specialized and well targeted. The standards for cosmetic tests are generally applied. The tests of the active ingredients in drug are macro-analyzed. The tests of the prohibited or restricted ingredients in cosmetics are micro-analyzed or trace-analyzed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229