检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐孝玉[1] 戴道明[1] TANG Xiaoyu DAI Daoming(School of Management Science and Engineering Research Center of Logistics and Supply Chain Managemen, Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu 233030,Chin)
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学管理科学与工程学院物流与供应链管理研究中心,安徽蚌埠233030
出 处:《沈阳理工大学学报》2017年第4期105-110,共6页Journal of Shenyang Ligong University
基 金:安徽省高校省级自然科学研究重大项目(KJ2015ZD02);安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金(ACYC2016164)
摘 要:基于两条由单制造商和单零售商组成的竞争闭环供应链,建立两条闭环供应链均为集中决策、均为分散决策以及混合决策的竞争模型,考察了竞争强度对供应链决策模式选择与供应链各方收益的影响。研究发现,在链链竞争环境下,闭环供应链的决策模式选择主要依赖于产品间的竞争强度。Based on two closed-loop supply chains (CLSCs) where each CLSC consisted of one manufacturer and one retailer, three different models were set up to characterize the competition when they were both decentralized and centralized CLSCs, one decentralized CLSC and one centralized CLSC, respectively. The impact of intensity of competition on de- cision model choice and the revenue of all parties were considered. Research shows that the decision mode of closed-loop supply chain mainly depends on the competition of product.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28