水刀微创与皮下修剪法治疗腋臭的效果比较  

The Clinical Effect of Water-jet Cutting and Subcutaneous Pruning Via Big Incisions for Bromhidrosis Surgery

作　　者：甄庆功 张正文[1] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学人民医院.河南省人民医院整形美容外科,河南郑州450003

出　　处：《中国美容医学》2017年第8期61-63,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine

摘　　要：目的:比较水刀微创与大切口皮下修剪法治疗腋臭的临床效果。方法:对75例腋臭患者按门诊号随机分成两组,治疗组和对照组。治疗组30例采用水刀微创治疗;对照组45例采用大切口皮下修剪法,对两组术后效果及并发症情况进行比较分析。结果:水刀微创治愈率为96.67%,大切口皮下修剪法治愈率为95.56%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);大切口皮下修剪法术后并发症发生率大于水刀微创,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:水刀微创治疗腋臭手术时间短,恢复快,总体并发症明显低于皮下修剪法,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the clinical effect of water-jet cutting and subcutaneous pruning via big incisions for bromhidrosis surgery. Methods Seventy-five patients who have been cured in our hospital from August 2015 to September 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, treatment group and control group. In the treatment group, 30 patients were treated with water-jet cutting, while 45 patients in the control group were treated with subcutaneous pruning via big incisions. And we have compared and analyzed the postoperative effect after 1 to 12 months follow-up. Results The cure rate of water-jet cutting is 96.6%, while that of subcutaneous pruning via big incisions is 95.5%, the difference was not statistically significant（P〉0.05）. The incidence of postoperative complication of the former is greater than that of the latter, the difference is statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The use of water-jet cutting for bromhidrosis surgery has such advantages as shorter operation time, postoperative recovery fast, overall complications are lower than that of subcutaneous pruning method dehiscence and quick recovery. Therefore, it can be extensively used in clinic.

关 键 词：腋臭 水刀治疗 微创 大切口 皮下修剪 临床效果 

分 类 号：R758.741[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]