医疗纠纷第三方调解公信力现状及推进路径研究  

Research on Status and Pushing Approach of Credibility of the Third-party Mediation in Medical Disputes

作　　者：张晓莉[1] 陈淑华[1] 杨德胜 赵一俏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省第二人民医院,广东广州510317 [2]广东<现代医院>杂志社编辑部,广东广州510180

出　　处：《中国医学伦理学》2017年第8期960-962,967,共4页Chinese Medical Ethics

基　　金：2016年广东省深化医药卫生体制改革领导小组办公室医改重点决策咨询研究项目;广东现代医院管理研究所科研立项课题(编号:201508)

摘　　要：医疗纠纷第三方调解机构的公信力在于其自身所具有的高效性、中立性、专业性和客观性等优势,但现实运作存在差异,第三方调解机构的公信力经常受到医患双方和公众的质疑,对此,将从专业性和中立性、立法讲法、筹资渠道、监督等方面对第三方调解机构的公信力现状及推进路径进行研究。The credibility of the third-party mediation agencies in medical disputes lies in their own advantages of efficiency, neutrality, professionalism and objectivity. However, because of the differences of actual operation, the credibility of the third-party mediation agencies often is questioned by both doctors and patients and the public. Aiming at these, this paper would study the status and the pushing approach of the third-party mediation agencies credibility from the perspective of professionalism and neutrality, legislation, fundraising channels and supervision.

关 键 词：医疗纠纷 第三方调解 公信力 

分 类 号：R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]