检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学心理学院暨认知神经科学实验室,南京210097
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2017年第4期613-617,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:江苏省第四期"333高层次人才培养工程"科研项目;江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(KYZZ16_0439);2016年优秀博士学位论文培育计划(YBPY16_007)
摘 要:目的:探讨高恶意创造力者的注意偏向和冲动控制特征。方法:采用自编恶意创造力测验测量恶意创造力;情绪Stroop测验测量攻击性词汇的注意偏向;BIS-11测量冲动控制特征。在此基础上探讨变量之间相关关系和高、低恶意创造力者的组间差异。结果:(1)高恶意创造力者比低恶意创造力者在攻击词注意偏向上得分更高;(2)恶意创造力与无计划冲动性维度呈显著负相关;(3)高恶意创造力者比低恶意创造力在无计划冲动性维度上得分更低。结论:(1)高恶意创造力者比低恶意创造力者存在更显著的攻击性注意偏向;(2)高恶意创造力者比低恶意创造力者在抑制冲动上存在优势。Objective: To explore the characteristics of attentional bias and impulsive control of highly malicious cre-ative people. Methods: The malicious creative test was used to measure malevolent creativity; emotional Stroop task wasused to measure the attentional bias of offensive words; BIS-11 Chinese Revised Version was used to measure the character-istics of impulsive control. Results:(1)Highly malicious creative people responded more slowly on the attack words taskthan lowly malicious creative people.(2)There was a negative correlation between the malevolent creativity and unplannedimpulsiveness latitude;(3)Highly malicious creative people got lower score of unplanned impulsiveness latitude than lowlymalicious creative people. Conclusion: Highly malicious creative people show more significant offensive attentional biasand better capability of impulse control than lowly malicious creative people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66