支付被侵权人合理费用者的直接求偿权探究  

On the Direct Claim of the Person Paid the Reasonable Fees for the Victim

作　　者：何焕锋[1] 

机构地区：[1]曲阜师范大学,山东日照276826

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2017年第2期41-45,共5页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：在被侵权人死亡的情形下,赋予支付被侵权人医疗费、丧葬费等合理费用的人就其支付的合理费用对侵权人享有直接求偿权是《侵权责任法》的制度创新。但立法的抽象、概括使得该制度略显粗糙。从解释论的视角分析,直接求偿权是基于法律直接规定而产生,权利人应包括除被侵权人近亲属和法定垫付人之外的无因管理人、医疗机构以及贷款人,其在享有直接求偿权的同时,还可基于无因管理或其他法律关系请求被侵权人继承人予以赔偿。在权利人和被侵权人继承人同时向侵权人主张赔偿,侵权人财产不足以同时支付的,直接求偿权优先。When the victim dies, to endow the person paid the medical fees, funeral fees and other reasonable fees the direct claim is the torts system innovation. Owing to abstraction and generalization of legislation, this system is rough . Based on the interpretation of law, the direct claim is the legal right of claim, obliges include negotiorum gestor, hospital and creditor except the victim＇ s close relatives and the persons having obligation to pay for the victim. Obliges also have claim against the infringer on the basis of spontaneous agency and other legal relations besides the direct claim. When the property of infringer is insufficient to indemnify compensation claim of oblige and the victim＇s inheritor, priority must be given to the direct claim.

关 键 词：合理费用 直接求偿权 解释论 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]