检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:戴金升 刘锦峰[1] 张娟[1] 温晓慧[1] 王彦君[1] 刘志勇[1] 杜晶艳[1] 王宁宇[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科、首都医科大学耳鼻咽喉科学院、耳鼻咽喉头颈科学教育部重点实验室首都医科大学,100020
出 处:《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》2017年第8期580-585,共6页Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81271090/H1304);北京市教委科技计划重点项目(KZ201410025027);北京市自然科学基金(7162066、7162072)
摘 要:目的 评估改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统对儿童声源定位能力测试的可行性.方法 利用改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统测试4~6岁听力正常儿童(15名,男童6名,女童9名)正前方水平方位角度辨别阈(minimum audible angle,MAA)及角度偏差值,并与改良前方法测得数据(10名,男童5名,女童5名)比较,验证改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统的准确性及稳定性.以SPSS 17.0软件对数据进行统计学分析(t检验).结果 改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统与改良前测试方法的准确性比较:4~6岁正常听力儿童改良后评测系统测试正前方MAA(3.23±1.00)°,角度偏差(13.68±5.18)°;改良前方法测试正前方MAA(3.17±0.59)°,角度偏差(13.96±4.56)°;组间差异均无统计学意义(t至分别为0.16、-0.14,P值均>0.05).改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统与改良前测试方法耗时比较:改良后测试耗时MAA为(14.67±1.95)min,角度偏差为(6.67±1.35)min;改良前测试耗时MAA为(36.30±6.81)min,角度偏差为(21.00±3.50)min,组间差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为-9.78 、-12.37,P值均<0.05).结论 改良儿童声源定位能力评测系统测试流程简单,耗时短,且结果稳定可信.Objective To evaluate the feasibility of modified test system for sound localization (SL) in children.Methods Modified system (6 male, 9 female) and traditional method (5 male, 5 female) were used for evaluation of minimum audible angle(MAA) and root-mean-square error(RMS) error of 4 to 6 years old children, and the results were compared to verify the accuracy and effectiveness of the modified test system for children sound localization.SPSS 17.0 software was used to analyze the data(t test).Results (1) Comparison of veracity of modified system and traditional test: when tested at the positive front position using modified system, MAA and RMS error were(3.23±1.00)° and (13.68±5.18)° respectively.When using traditional method,MAA and RMS error were(3.17±0.59)°and (13.96±4.56)° respectively.No statistical differences were found between two groups(t value was 0.16,-0.14, both P〉0.05).(2) Comparison of time used were as followed: when using modified system, it was (14.67±1.95) min for MAA, and (6.67±1.35) min for RMS error.When using traditional method, it was (36.30±6.81) min for MAA, and (21.00±3.50) min for RMS error.Time used were significant shorter in modified system than in traditional method (t value was-9.78 ,-12.37, both P〈0.05).Conclusion Modified test system for children sound localization is useful and reliable in children′s horizontal SL test.The time used of modified test system is shorter than that of traditional test system.
分 类 号:R764[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.183.215