检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学世界民族学人类学研究中心,北京100081 [2]中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院,北京100081
出 处:《世界民族》2017年第4期93-102,共10页Journal of World Peoples Studies
基 金:中央民族大学世界民族学人类学研究中心2014年度海外田野调查基金(项目号:MUC-SHJ-HW 201401)的资金支持
摘 要:种族和解以来,在开普敦大学,以种族为基础的招生政策并没有改变高等教育机会不平等问题,白人仍然占据大部分教育机会。由于阶层分化加剧,黑人中产阶层家庭的学生拥有比来自弱势家庭、弱势学校的黑人学生高得多的教育机会,种族内部的高等教育机会不平等问题日渐凸显。此外,白人弱势群体的子女也逐渐被排斥在精英高等学府之外,新的种族间高等教育机会不平等问题开始出现。为应对高等教育机会不平等从种族到阶层的新变化,开普敦大学以阶层为基础,建立起包括申请人的家庭语言、父母和祖父母的教育背景、申请人的家庭是否依赖政府救助,以及基础教育学校条件等指标为一体的复合型招生政策,以促进高等教育机会的公平化。Based on empirical research from the University of Cape Town, we found that racebased admissions policies did not change the inequality of access to higher education; whites still dominate most educational opportunities. As class differences increase, applicants from black middle-class families have more access than applicants from disadvantaged schools and disadvantaged families. Thus, inequality within ethnic groups has become prominent. In addition, some white applicants from disadvantaged schools and disadvantaged families are gradually being excluded from elite universities. New inequalities in opportunity for higher education are beginning to emerge. In response to the new trend of unequal access to higher education, the University of Cape Town adopted a new class-based admissions policy to promote equity in education, including the applicant' s family language, parents' and grandparents' educational backgrounds, whether the applicant' s family rely on government assistance, and the quality of the applicant' s school from which they receive basic education.
分 类 号:G649.478[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43