检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医科大学科学技术处,650500 [2]云南省科学技术厅
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2017年第4期263-267,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:受国家自然科学基金资助课题(81660545);云南省教育厅重点项目资助(2012Z090)
摘 要:目的结合我国西部云南地区高等医学院校的科研工作实际,构建一套适宜的科研绩效评价指标体系。方法采用文献分析法、德尔菲法、群体层次分析法及专家权威度计算方法进行科研绩效指标体系的构建。结果构建出包含科研投入和科研产出的科研绩效评价指标体系,科研投入指标体系包括经费投入和人力投入2个一级指标,科研产出包括定量和定性2个一级指标,定量指标包括6个二级指标、6个三级指标和37个四级指标。指标权重的计算考虑到二级单位的不同性质,并采用了定量和定性相结合及一票否决制等体现分类评价思想的方法。结论本指标体系可用于各学院系的科研绩效进行评价,对其实现微观或中观层面的管理和调控,同时期望对高校广大科技人员及科研管理工作者有所启发。Objective Taking into account of the actual scientific research conducted at medical universities in Yunnan Province, Southwest China, to develop an appropriate evaluation index system of scientific research performance. Methods main methodologies and procedures adopted to develop the evaluation index system include literature analysis, Delphi method, Group Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert authority calculation. Results The evaluation index system of scientific research performance consists of scientific research input index system and output index system. The scientific research input index system includes financial input and human resources input as two primary indicators. While the scientific research output index system is made up of two primary indicators, named quantitative output and qualitative output. There are another six second-level indicators, six third-level indicators and 37 fourth-level indicators to make up of the quantitative output index system. Calcula- tion of the indicator weight will consider the natures of different units or departments, the mixed anal- ysis of quantitative and qualitative methods, as well as one-vote veto decision were adopted to make sure classified assessment were actually implemented during the evaluation process. Conclusions The index system is suggested to be used for evaluating scientific research performance in different colleges or departments. Adopting such system can help the management of scientific research performances at both micro-and meso-levels. It may also inspire more researchers and research management personnel in a broader sense.
关 键 词:科研绩效 评价指标体系 德尔菲法 群体层次分析法
分 类 号:G644[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117