新闻的公共性、专业性与有机性——以“民主之春”、延安时期新闻实践为例  

The Journalistic Publicity,Professionalism,and dynamism:A Case Study of the Democratic Spring and Journalism in the Yan'an Period

作　　者：李海波[1] 

机构地区：[1]清华大学新闻与传播学院,北京100084

出　　处：《新闻大学》2017年第4期8-17,共10页Journalism Research

基　　金：中信改革发展研究基金会的资助

摘　　要：美国媒体对"民主之春"的集体漠视,预示了当代世界普遍的新闻公共性危机,也是民主政治的危机。在市场逻辑和专业主义意识形态主导之下,媒体结构性地偏向城市中产阶级和各界精英,忽视普通民众的声音,贬抑社会底层的发言权。这背离了平等进入、广泛参与等公共性原则,使得公共空间等级化、封建化,在一些重大议题上社会不同利益群体的声音无法有效表达,难以通过辩论和博弈形成共同意志和公共决策。延安时期的新闻大众化运动践行"群众路线"理念,致力于呈现底层民众的呼声和需求,构成了一种独特的现代新闻范式,可作为反思当代媒体状况的批判性资源,有助于打开新的想象未来的空间。The collective disregard of US media for the Democratic Spring reflects the crisis of journalistic publicity in contemporary world,which is a part of the crisis of democratic politics.Under the influence of market logic and professionalism ideology,news media demonstrate a structural bias towards the urban middle class and other elites,neglecting the voices of average people.This violation of the principles of equal access and extensive participation results in the classification and feudalization of the public sphere.Common will and public policy are unable to be reached by social debate because various interest groups cannot express themselves efficiently.The popularization movement of journalism in the Yan’an period implemented the concept of mass line,trying to represent the voices and feelings of the unprivileged people.It was an unique paradigm of modern journalism,beneficial to rethink about the condition of contemporary media and imagine the future.

关 键 词：新闻公共性 专业主义 延安范式 有机知识分子 

分 类 号：G210[文化科学—新闻学]