检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:覃洁[1]
出 处:《中国实用医药》2017年第20期142-144,共3页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的观察综合护理干预对高血压脑出血患者术后康复情况及心理状态的影响。方法 94例高血压脑出血患者,按护理方案不同分为对照组和观察组,各47例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组在对照组基础上行综合护理干预,对比两组康复情况及心理状态。结果护理后,观察组Fugl-Meyer评分、功能独立性量表(FIM)评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分为(35.14±5.36)分,抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分为(40.01±4.12)分,均优于对照组的(42.08±6.25)、(48.26±4.69)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合护理可促进高血压脑出血患者加快术后康复,并改善心理状态,效果显著,值得推广。Objective To observe the influence of comprehensive nursing intervention on postoperative rehabilitation condition and psychological status of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods A total of 94 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were divided by different nursing methods into control group and observation group, with 47 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing, and the observation group received comprehensive nursing on the basis of the control group. Comparison were made on rehabilitation condition and psychological status in two groups. Results After nursing, the observation group had better Fugl-Meyer score and functional independence measure (FIM) score than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). The observation group had self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) score as (35.14 ± 5.36) points and self-rating depression scale (SDS) score as (40.01 ± 4.12) points, which were all better than (42.08 ± 6.25) and (48.26 ± 4.69) points in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing shows remarkable effect in promoting the rehabilitation of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and improving their psychological status. So it is worth popularizing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28