伍子胥评说的历史审视  

A Historical Review on the Comments of Wu Zi-xu

作　　者：苗江磊 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,山东济南250199

出　　处：《广东开放大学学报》2017年第4期61-65,共5页JOURNAL OF GUANGDONG OPEN UNIVERSITY

摘　　要：伍子胥在其父被楚平王杀害后逃楚入吴,后事吴王阖闾献策攻楚,最终引吴军入郢攻破楚国,此复仇故事自产生后,不同朝代基于其社会现实、思想观念,产生了不同的"评"与"说"。从《左传》记载中伍子胥复仇故事具备基本轮廓,到汉代《史记》《吴越春秋》等作品对复仇故事的刻画一步步深入,对复仇故事的评价一直呈肯定态度。而汉代,扬雄却首次提出了对伍子胥复仇的批评,但此批判之声直至唐代也未能形成主流。宋代以后,批判伍子胥复仇为不忠的观点愈演愈烈,而元明清以后,儒者们重新审视此复仇故事,更多人趋向于理解与同情。The controversy of Wu Zi-xu＇s revenge story arises mainly from different judgments. Different dynasties, based on various social realities and ideas, produced different interpretations. The story originated from ＂Zuo Zhuan＂, and developed with elaborations in ＂Shi Ji＂ and ＂Wu Yue Chunqiu＂. In Song Dynasty, the criticism of the hero＇s disloyalty intensified. Nevertheless Yuan Ming and Qing Dynasties witnessed more understanding and sympathy.

关 键 词：伍子胥 复仇 历代评说 审视 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学] I206.4