程序正义理念的实证研究——对呼格吉勒图再审案和聂树斌再审案的比较分析  

The Empirical Research on the Theory of Procedural Justice——A Comparison between the Hugejiletu Case and the Nie Shubin Case

作　　者：周宝峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古大学法学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010021

出　　处：《内蒙古大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第4期73-83,共11页Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：呼格吉勒图再审案和聂树斌再审案是两个相似并具有重大影响的大案。这两起冤案均发生于法治不彰的"严打"期间,并且均为"真凶出现"进而获得昭雪的结果。综观这两起再审案的实际运行及其运行结果,二者既有高度相似的背景因素和实体结果,也有不同的程序运行轨迹,更有因时间因素而导致的程序正义理念落实程度的差异。两起再审案的启动在本质上均属于非程序性的再审启动。两起再审案的实践再一次证明,我国审判监督程序的启动程序必须经受符合程序正义理念的改造。与呼格吉勒图再审案的存疑无罪判决相比,聂树斌再审案的存疑无罪判决更加符合程序正义的应有之义。没有贯彻回避和变更管辖这两种程序制度所体现的程序正义理念,是呼格吉勒图再审案的硬伤。聂树斌再审案的异地复查和最高人民法院提审则体现了裁判中立的程序正义立场,是程序正义理念的重大进步。Both the Hugejiletu retrial case and the Nie Shubin retrial case are interrelated and have significant influence on Chinese society. Their unjust verdicts were given during the arbitrary ＂Cracking down on criminal offenses＂ period in China. Their grievances were redressed later after the real criminals were found. Their backgrounds and retrial verdicts were highly similar, but their retrial procedures were different. There were differences in sticking to the procedural justice theory due to the time factor. Both the two retrial cases were not started according to the procedural justice theory. It is necessary to reform the proce- dure of criminal trial supervision in accordance with the procedural justice theory in China. Compared with the acquittal of Hugejiletu retrial case, the open verdict of Nie Shubin retrial case was coincident with the procedural justice. The Hugejiletu retrial procedure disobeyed the challenge system and alteration of jurisdiction system. The alteration of jurisdiction of Nie Shubin retrial case conformed with the procedural justice and was making significant advances in Chinese criminal procedure.

关 键 词：程序正义 司法改革 审判监督程序 再审 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]