检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:边金尧[1] 成玉国[1] 任小广[2] 徐新海[2]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军91550部队91分队 [2]中国人民解放军国防科学技术大学计算机学院
出 处:《兵器装备工程学报》2017年第7期171-175,共5页Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering
摘 要:研究Singhal模型、Zwart模型和Schnerr模型在大尺寸潜航体绕体空泡流模拟计算上的可行性,利用上述空化模型结合混合物模型和湍流模型模拟了大尺寸潜航体绕体定常空泡流,对潜航体壁面压力进行了对比分析;结果表明:在大尺寸潜航体头部和空泡区域内不同空化模型获得的壁面压力一致性较好,但对空泡封闭端和空泡下游计算与实验结果存在差异;三种不同空化模型可用于大尺寸潜航体绕体空泡流模拟计算,迭代计算过程中不同空化模型受松弛因子的影响较大。It studied the feasibility of three different cavitation models,which include Singhal model,Zwart model and Schnerr model,and used them to simulate cavitation flow around a large submerged body which moves at high speed under water. Then pressure results on wall of submerged body are compared with experiment data. One can obtain the following conclusions. Firstly,the sensitive extent among three different cavitation models to under-relaxation factors differs from each other in iteration process. On the nose of the submerged body and in the cavity around the body,wall pressure results agree well with experiment data. However,in the downstream of the cavitation flow,wall pressure results agree limited with experiment data. Secondly,three different cavitation models can be used to simulate cavitation flow around the large submerged body.
关 键 词:潜航体 绕体空泡流 壁面压力 空化模型 模拟计算
分 类 号:TV131.3[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.10.218