检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓小莹[1] 周晓虹[1] 陈洁[1] 李国豪[1]
出 处:《今日药学》2017年第8期560-563,共4页Pharmacy Today
基 金:广州市医药卫生科技项目(20141A010011);广东省医院药学研究基金(2015A07)
摘 要:目的对两种乳腺癌辅助治疗方案:AC-T方案(多柔比星+环磷酰胺-多西他赛)、AC-TH方案(多柔比星+环磷酰胺-曲妥珠单抗+多西他赛)进行药物经济学评价。方法根据疾病稳定、疾病缓解、疾病进展和死亡4种状态,建立马尔可夫(Markov)模型,以广州市某三甲医院的收费标准确定两种方案的总成本,进行成本效果分析,并对结果进行敏感度分析,发现最优方案。结果 AC-T方案和AC-TH方案的治疗总成本分别为92 490.03元及409 271.85元;两种方案所获得的生命质量调整年(QALYs)分别为11.45 QALYs及14.28 QALYs;联用曲妥珠单抗后的增量成本效果比(ICER)为111 937.04元/QALY。敏感度分析结果稳定,不影响模型分析结构。结论 AC-TH方案与AC-T方案相比,ICER超过支付意愿,从成本效果分析看来,AC-TH方案为优选方案。OBJECTIVE To perform a pharmacoeconomic evaluation of Trastuzumab in adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer.METHODS Built a Markov state transition model to simulate the dynamic changes of the four disease states( including stable disease,disease remission,disease progression and death) in patients who received AC-T therapy or AC-TH therapy with early breast cancer. The costs of these two therapies were calculated according to the charging standard of a third-level grade-A hospital in Guangzhou city.One way sensitivity analysis was carried out then. RESULTS The costs of AC-T therapy and AC-TH therapy were 92 490.03 Yuan and 409 271.85 Yuan,respectively.The model showed that quality-adjusted life-years( QALYs) of AC-T therapy and AC-TH therapy were 11.45 QALYs、14.28 QALYs,respectively. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio( ICER) of 111 937. 04 Yuan/QALY gained. CONCLUSION Compare with AC-T therapy,the ICER of AC-TH therapy is out of pay,but as to cost-effectiveness analysis,AC-TH therapy is the preferred option.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117