检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国伤残医学》2017年第16期34-35,共2页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
基 金:聊城市科技发展计划项目
摘 要:目的:研究扩散加权成像(DWI)在膝关节前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂诊断中的价值.方法:回顾性分析65例ACL撕裂患者的临床及影像学资料,所有患者均行常规磁共振扫描并加扫DWI序列.参照关节镜检查结果,比较联合运用DWI前后对ACL撕裂诊断的正确率. 结果:65例患者经关节镜证实,ACL部分撕裂36例,完全撕裂29例.应用DWI前后ACL撕裂诊断符合率分别为70.8%(46/65)、90.7%(59/65),2种方法诊断ACL撕裂符合率差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论:膝关节常规磁共振检查联合DWI可以显著提高前交叉韧带撕裂诊断的正确率,减少了漏诊与误诊的发生.Objective:To explore the value of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear. Meth. otis: Clinical and imaging data of 65 cases of ACL tear proved by arthroseopy were analyzed retrospectively. They underwent both conven- tional magnetic resonance imaging and DWI. The diagnosis accordance rate of ACL tear with or without DWI was compared. Results: In 65 patients,there were 36 eases of patients with partial ACL tear and 29 eases of patients with complete ACL tear. The accurate rate of ACL tear diagnosis was 70.8% ( 46/65 ) and 90.7% ( 59/65 ) with or without DWI, they had statistically significant difference( P 〈0. 05 ). Conclusion: Combined application of conventional MR sequences and DW1 could improve the diagnosis accordance rate of ACL tear.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.19