检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北法学》2017年第9期11-22,共12页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:刑法的第二次性质(sekundare-Natur)决定了"婚内强奸"问题不仅是一个刑法学的问题,同样是一个民法学的问题。关于此问题,各种学说争论的焦点归根结底落在同居权上,只有对夫妻同居权及其属性进行辨析,才能从逻辑上完成对婚内强奸行为违法性的基础证成。就违法层面,婚内强奸行为可以构成强奸罪,但必须考虑刑法的谦抑性原则以及刑事政策的应用;就责任层面,违法性认识的可能性可以部分甚至完全阻却丈夫的责任(但不是故意)。婚内强奸行为的追诉宜归为自诉罪,并限定其期限。The second nature of criminal law determines that the problem of marital rape is not only a question of criminal law, but also a problem of civil law. On this issue, all kinds of arguments in the final analysis focus on the Cohabitation right, only by analyzing the right of cohabitation and its properties can it logically complete the basis of the illegality of marital rape. As the illegal level, the behavior of the marital rape can constitute the rape, but it must consider the concept of the restraining criminal law and criminal policy; as the responsibility level, the possibility of illegal cognition can be partially or even completely hinders the husband's responsibility (but not intention). The prosecution of marital rape should be classified as the crime of private prosecution and should have a definite deadline.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.171.161