基于WoS和Scopus数据库的期刊评价指标研究  被引量:3

Research on Periodical Evaluation Index Based on WoS and Scopus Database

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:王超[1] 彭超群[1] 

机构地区:[1]中南大学出版社<中国有色金属学报>编辑部,长沙410083

出  处:《价值工程》2017年第28期242-246,共5页Value Engineering

基  金:中国科技期刊国际影响力提升计划资助项目(2016-15A);中国科协精品科技期刊工程资助项目(TOP50-2015-25)

摘  要:本文选取被WoS数据库和Scopus数据库同时收录的21种中国材料类期刊作为研究对象,分别统计各期刊2015年的被引频次、载文量、IF、IF5、ES、SJR、H指数和SNIP,研究WoS数据库和Scopus数据库的引文评价核心指标对期刊评价的相关性和差异性,为构建科技期刊综合评价指标体系提供参考。结果表明:SJR、H指数、SNIP、被引频次、IF、IF5和ES七个指标两两之间都具有显著的相关性,其中SJR、IF和IF5之间的相关性最高。SJR排名、H指数排名、SNIP排名、IF排名、IF5排名、ES排名之间差异不显著。Scopus数据库和WoS数据库评价期刊时具有可比性和可替代性。In this paper, 21 kinds of Chinese materials journals included in the WoS database and Scopus database were selected as the research objects, the cited frequency, loading volume, IF, IF5, ES, SJR, H index and SNIP were respectively counted, the relevance and difference of the periodical evaluation was studied by citation evaluation core indexes of WoS database and Scopus database to provide reference for the construction of comprehensive evaluation index system of sci-tech periodicals. The results showed that there were significant correlations among SJR, H index, SNIP, cited frequency, IF, IF5 and ES, and the correlation among SJR, IF and IF5 was the highest, and the difference among SJR ranking, H index ranking, SNIP ranking, IF ranking, IF5 ranking, ES ranking was not significant.Scopus database and WoS database are comparable and replaceable when evaluating journals.

关 键 词:WoS数据库 SCOPUS数据库 期刊评价 被引频次 载文量 IF IF5 ES SJR H指数 SNIP 

分 类 号:G255.2[文化科学—图书馆学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象