司法“接近正义”之实践逻辑转向  

The Turn of the Practical Logic of Judicial "Approaching Justice"

作　　者：王荔[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学哲学与政府管理学院

出　　处：《学术前沿》2017年第16期98-101,共4页Frontiers

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目"司法民主与接近正义问题研究";项目编号为:16FFX003;中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目"法伦理学视域下‘接近正义’的司法环境治理研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号为:1201040060

摘　　要：我国的"接近正义"改革,是在对西方模式借鉴的基础上,大力推进小额诉讼、简易程序等诉讼程序的简便化,建立和完善我国的法律援助制度,构建替代性纠纷解决机制(ADR)以及公益诉讼制度等,力求使司法的利用更加平等、广泛和便利。忽视司法资源的稀缺性所致的司法权能之限度,会加深人们对司法社会功能及其限度的误解,使司法更加不堪重负。坚持"司法克制"原则,才能在缓解司法压力的同时,提升司法的公信力和权威性。总之,"接近正义"改革实践逻辑的转向,以"司法克制"原则框定司法权能的边界和限度,是解决我国"接近正义"改革实践中诸多问题的突破口。China＇s ＂approaching justice＂ reform means to refer to the Western model, vigorously facilitate the litigation procedure by promoting small-claim litigations and suinmary procedure, establish a sound legal aid system, construct the alternative dispute resolution （ADR） mechanism and the public interest litigation system, and strive for equitable, extensive and convenient use of justice. Ignoring the limits of judicial power caused by the scarcity of judicial resources will lead to deepened misunderstanding of the social fhnction and limits of justice, so that the judicial system takes on intolerable burdens. When we adhere to the ＂judicial restraint＂ principle, we can ease the pressure of the judiciary while enhancing its credibility and authority In short, changing the practical logic of the ＂approaching justice＂ reform and using the ＂udicial restraint＂ principle to define the boundary and limit of judicial power are the breakthrough point for solving the various problems facing the ＂approaching justice＂ reform.

关 键 词：接近正义 司法克制主义 司法资源 

分 类 号：DF0[政治法律—法学理论]