检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王杰茹[1]
机构地区:[1]山东财经大学财政税务学院,讲师经济学博士济南250014
出 处:《公共财政研究》2017年第4期68-81,67,共15页Public Finance Research Journal
摘 要:高等教育有提升人力资本、加速社会创新和缓解贫困代际传递、降低社会不公平的重要功能,优质高等教育资源的配置问题一直被社会学、经济学和教育学领域广泛探讨。通过梳理文献发现,高等教育难以克服客观社会分层造成的贫富差距,反而在不断加速阶层固化。财政作为高等教育的资金供给主体和资源配置主体,理应充分发挥其调节收入分配的作用,向贫困阶层和弱势群体倾斜,促进高等教育均衡。从横向公平和纵向公平角度看,财政支出结构和规模都存在问题,财政资源配置失衡存在于地区之间、高校之间、社会群体之间,阻碍了高等教育均衡发展。应以财税改革为契机,建立绩效评估和监督制约机制,增强高校财政拨款的针对性、引导性,激励高校差异化、特色化改革发展。Higher education has an important function of promoting human capital, accelerating social innovation, alleviating intergenerational transmission of poverty and reducing social injustice. Allocation of high-quality education resources has been widely discussed by sociologist, economist and educationalist.By sorting the literature, we find that higher education would not able to overcome the wealth gap caused by social stratification, on the contrary, it accelerates social curing. As the subject of financing and resource allocation of higher education, pubic finance should give full play to its effect on regulating income distribution, leaning towards poor and vulnerable groups, to promote higher education equilibrium. In reality, both from perspective of horizontal fairness and vertical fairness, structure and scale problems exist. Disequilibrium exists among regions, universities and social groups, hindering the development of higher education. Taking fiscal and taxation reform as an opportunity, we should establish a performance evaluation and supervision mechanism, enhance pertinence and guidance of university funding, and stimulate personalized and differentiated development of colleges and universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.141.107.132