检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]国家烟草专卖局烟草经济研究所,北京100045 [2]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872
出 处:《郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版)》2017年第3期1-11,共11页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71103169);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2014M550975)
摘 要:文章检验农村地区乡土邻里互助文化对农民进城务工计划的影响。一方面,我国传统农村乡土社会居民的行为往往围绕着邻里而展开,农村乡土邻里互助所构成的社会网络发挥了信息共享的作用,有助于农村居民分享外出务工信息。另一方面,邻里互助的存在使外出务工的农民及其留守农村的家人拥有了隐形的社会保障,降低了流动风险。利用中国综合社会调查(CGSS)2010数据,文章构建Logit模型验证乡土邻里互助文化是否影响农民进城务工计划,结果显示,以邻里文化为基础的乡土互助行为有助于农民进城务工。This paper tests the impacts of the rural culture of neighborhood mutual-aid on the farmers' will of migrating to work in the city. On one hand,in the traditional rural society,residential behaviors are often carried out around neighborhoods. As a unique social capital carrier,the rural social networks formed from neighborhood mutual-aid plays a role in information sharing,which help rural residents to share a variety of urban work information. On the other hand,to help each other in need among neighborhoods can form the rural social safety nets,which make the farmers get the invisible social security and reduce the liquidity risk. Using the data of Chinese General Social Survey( CGSS) 2010,based on the results of LOGIT model empirical test,this paper finds that the rural mutual-aid behaviors based on the relationship among neighborhoods contribute to the going out of rural labors for non-agricultural jobs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173