检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中外医疗》2017年第19期83-85,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的观察与探究肩锁部手术应用臂丛颈丛联合阻滞的麻醉效果。方法方便选取2013年11月—2016年11月期间于该院就诊及行肩锁部手术治疗的60例患者作为研究对象,按照行肩部和锁骨手术时选取的麻醉方式不同分为两组,每组有30例患者,对对照组患者给予臂丛阻滞麻醉,对观察组患者给予臂丛颈丛联合阻滞麻醉,对比并分析两组患者的麻醉效果及满意度。结果观察组患者的麻醉优良率(93.33%)与对照组患者(66.67%)相对比,组间差异有统计意义(P<0.05),观察组患者的满意度(96.67%)与对照组患者(70.00%)相对比,组间差异有统计意义(P<0.05)。结论对肩锁部手术患者使用臂丛颈丛联合阻滞的麻醉效果比较好。Objective To observe and study the anesthesia effect of brachial plexus and cervical plexus and blocking in acromioclavicular surgery. Methods Convenient selection 60 cases of patients undergoing the acromioclavicular surgery in our hospital from November 2013 to November 2016 were selected and divided into two groups according to different anesthesia methods with 30 cases in each, the control group adopted the brachial plexus and blocking, while the observation group adopted the brachial plexus and cervical plexus and blocking, and the anesthesia effect and satisfactory degree of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The difference in the excellent and good rate between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant(93.33% vs 66.67%)(P<0.05), and the difference in the satisfactory degree between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant(96.67% vs 70.00%)(P<0.05). Conclusion The effect of brachial plexus and cervical plexus and blocking in acromioclavicular surgery is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28