三种干燥方式下天然麝香中麝香酮含量的测定  

Influence of Three Different Drying Methods on the Determination of Muscone in Musk

作　　者：胡罕[1,2] 车利锋[1] 张洪峰[1] 刘艳[1] 刘宝庆 吴晓民[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西省动物研究所,西安710032 [2]西北大学生命科学学院,西安710069 [3]陕西片仔癀麝业有限公司,陕西宝鸡721700

出　　处：《特产研究》2017年第3期43-45,共3页Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research

摘　　要：圈养林麝人工取香后需要对天然麝香进行干燥后方能长期保存,为了研究不同的干燥方法是否对麝香酮的含量产生影响,本实验取天然林麝麝香样本3份,分别用冷冻真空减压干燥法、烘干法(40℃)、五氧化二磷干燥法3种不同的干燥方法对天然麝香进行干燥;采用气相色谱法测定麝香中的麝香酮含量。结果发现,3种干燥方法下取样计算麝香酮的含量分别为(4.75±0.34)%、(3.99±0.36)%、(2.83±0.40)%,三者之间存在较大的差异。建议在以麝香酮含量高低作为判断的依据时,应备注干燥的处理方法作为参考指标。Musk by the musk extraction from captive musk deer must be dry before the natural musk can be preserved for a long time. To explore influence of different drying methods on the determination of muscone in musk, 3 groups of the natural musk were dried randomly by vacuum freeze-drying, drying（40℃）, phosphorus pentoxide dryer, then the muscone content were determined by GC in musk. The results showedthatthe content ofthe muscone was （4.75±0.34）% , （3.99±0.36）% , （2.83±0.40）% inthe samples underthethree kinds of drying methods. According to comparison , three methods have significant differences in content ofmuscone calculated on an anhydrous basis. It is suggested thatthe treatment method ofdryweightloss should be referred as reference indexwhenjudging the content ofmuscone.

关 键 词：干燥 麝香酮 气相色谱法 

分 类 号：R282.740.2[医药卫生—中药学]