检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2017年第19期139-140,共2页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的探究脑出血合并糖尿病患者在临床护理过程中经常存在的安全隐患以及相应的处理措施,并分析处理措施的效果,为临床工作提供参考依据。方法将2015年1月—2017年3月在我院进行住院治疗的95例脑出血合并糖尿病患者作为本组研究的观察对象。按照入院时间的先后顺序分为对照组(47例)与观察组(48例)。对照组给予常规的护理,观察组在进行常规护理的基础上根据患者的安全隐患给予相应处理措施,对比两组的护理情况。结果观察组经相应的处理措施后,各项安全隐患的发生率低于对照组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在脑出血合并糖尿病患者的护理过程中,要密切观察患者存在的安全隐患,而且通过及时的处理措施,可以有效预防安全隐患的发生,保证患者的治疗效果和生命安全。Objective To explore the safety risks and the corresponding treatment measures in patients with cerebral hemorrhage and diabetes mellitus during clinical nursing process, and to analyze the effect of treatment measures, and to provide reference for clinical work. Methods A total of 95 patients with cerebral hemorrhage and diabetes mellitus who were hospitalized in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2017 were selected as the subjects of this study. According to the order of admission time, they were divided into control group (47 cases) and observation group (48 cases). The control group was given routine care, and the observation group was given routine treatment on the basis of routine nursing care. The nursing situation of the two groups was compared. Results After the corresponding treatment measures in the observation group, the incidence of all kinds of security risks was lower than that of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically signifcant (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion In the nursing process of patients with cerebral hemorrhage and diabetes mellitus, we should closely observe the hidden dangers of the patients, and adopt timely treatment measures. The utility model can effectively prevent the occurrence of hidden dangers and ensure the therapeutic effect and the life safety of the patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.121.71