检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省疾病预防控制中心,哈尔滨150036 [2]哈尔滨医科大学,哈尔滨150081
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2017年第9期76-80,共5页Chinese Health Economics
摘 要:目的:构建卫生监督机构突发事件应急反应能力评价指标体系框架。方法:通过文献法、头脑风暴法和专家咨询法,初拟评价指标体系框架,采用德尔菲法进行两轮专家征询,确立评价指标体系框架。结果:两轮问卷回收率均为100%,一级指标权威系数the first index均值为0.82,第二轮专家咨询一、二、三级指标的协调系数分别为0.954、0.820、0.565,P<0.05。建立了卫生监督机构突发公共卫生事件应急反应能力评价指标体系,指标体系框架包括4个一级指标,10个二级指标和37个三级指标。结论:专家意见的可靠性较高,指标筛选过程比较规范,指标比较全面,可用于实践进一步检验与完善。Objective: To construct an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability in health supervision institu- tions. Methods: It made an initial indicator system by using brain storming, literature method and expert consulting, and constructed an evaluation indicator system by Delphi method. Results: Both the response rates of two round questionnaires survey were 100%, The means of authoritative coefficient for the first-dimension indicators was 0.82. For the second round of expert consuhing, the coordina- lion coefficients of the first, second and third-dimension indicators were 0.954, 0.820 and 0.565 respectively (P〈O.05). It construct- ed an evaluation indicator system for emergency response capability among health supervision institutions. There were 4 first-dimctl- sion indicators, lO second-dimension indicators and 37 third-dimension indicators in the indicators system. Conclusion: Experts opinions had high reliability. The process of screening indicators was normative. The indicator system was comprehensive, which could be used and examined in practice.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169