试论我国数字图书馆侵权责任法律制度的完善——以《侵权责任法》第三十六条为核心的探讨  

A Preliminary Study of the Improvement of Digital Library Tort Liability Legal System in China:Taking Article 36 of the Tort Liability Law as an Example

作　　者：王爱霞[1] 王鸿信[2] 申贵珍 

机构地区：[1]西北政法大学图书馆,陕西西安710122 [2]西北政法大学经济学院,陕西西安710122 [3]西安市人民检察院,陕西西安710016

出　　处：《情报理论与实践》2017年第9期29-32,共4页Information Studies:Theory & Application

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"数字信息资源长期保存机制及法律保障研究"(项目编号:13XT006);陕西省社会科学基金项目"数字图书馆法律属性及其法律责任研究--类型化的研究视角"(项目编号:10M005)的阶段性研究成果之一

摘　　要：2010年颁布的《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》为数字图书馆侵权责任问题的解决提供了法律依据。该法第三十六条专条规定了数字图书馆侵权责任的归责原则。但该条规定还存在一些问题,如归责原则存在不足、间接侵权责任主观过错界定不明确、"通知"规定存在疏漏、责任形态规定不统一等。因此,对于《侵权责任法》第三十六条的规定要从分类细化归责原则的具体适用、明确界定间接侵权的主观要件、完善法条以弥补疏漏、统一规定侵权责任形态等几个方面进行修改和完善,以规制数字图书馆法律责任,推动数字图书馆事业的不断发展。The ＂Tort Liability Law of the People＇s Republic of China＂ established in 2010 has provided the legal basis to re- solve the digital library copyright infringement liability problem. Although the method prescribed in article 36 has specified principle of liability fixation in infringement of the digital library, some problems still exist, such as some oversights of liability principle, blur definition of subjective fault in indirect infringement liability, leaky ＂ notice＂ provisions, different responsibility forms, etc. Therefore, the provisions of article 36 should be improved from refining the specific applications of liability principles in different categories, clearly defining the subjective important documents in indirect copyright infringement, updating the law to make up for oversights, and standardizing tort liability forms. These improvements can regulate digital library legal responsibility and promote the continuous development of digital libraries.

关 键 词：数字图书馆 法律制度 侵权责任 归责原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]