检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安连超[1] 耿艳萌[1] 陈靖涵[2] 李春梅[1] 赫英娟[1]
机构地区:[1]牡丹江医学院基础心理教研室 [2]黑龙江幼儿师范高等专科学校,157001
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2017年第9期1369-1371,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学项目(编号:12542294)
摘 要:目的:探讨大学生共情与亲社会行为间的关系。方法:采用人际反应指针量表(IRI)和亲社会倾向量表(PTM)对365名大学生进行调查研究。结果:(1)不同年级大学生的共情得分不存在显著性差异(P>0.05);(2)不同年级大学生的亲社会行为得分不存在显著性差异(P>0.05);(3)不同性别大学生的共情得分存在显著性差异(t=4.454,P<0.001);(4)不同性别大学生的亲社会行为得分存在显著性差异(t=16.726,P<0.001);(5)文科生与理科生的共情得分存在显著性差异(t=3.105,P<0.001);(6)文科生与理科生的亲社会行为得分存在显著性差异(t=8.647,P<0.001);(7)共情可以显著预测亲社会行为。结论:大学生共情可以影响其亲社会行为。Objective:To explore the relationship between empathy and pro-social behavior of university students. Methods:This study used Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)questionnaire and Pro - social Tendency Measure (PTM)to investigate 365 university students.Results:① There was not significant difference between different grades in the scores of empathy(P 〉0.05 ).②There was not significant difference between different grades in the scores of pro-social behavior.③There was significant difference between different genders in the scores of empathy (t =4.454,P 〈0.001).④There was significant difference between different genders in the scores of pro-social be-havior(t =16.726,P 〈0.001).⑤There was significant difference between students of liberal arts and students of sci-ence in the scores of empathy(t =3.105,P 〈0.001 ).⑥There was significant difference between students of liberal arts and students of science in the scores of pro-social behavior(t =8.647,P 〈0.001).⑦Empathy could forecast pro-social behavior significantly.Conclusion:Empathy of university students can affect their pro-social behavior.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.69