检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学社会学院,南京210046
出 处:《江苏行政学院学报》2017年第5期58-64,共7页The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"现阶段我国城市居住问题的社会学研究"(11CSH071);国家社会科学基金项目"住房制度改革中的政策因素与个体因素对贫富分化的影响研究"(16BSH086)的阶段性成果
摘 要:住房限购政策是当前对住房市场调控的一种重要行政干预措施。以J市为例,对"限定谁"、"怎么限定"的深入分析表明,住房限购政策具有明显的歧视性与易变性。限购的背后隐含着一种矛盾转移的权力游戏,它不仅误伤了正常的购房需求,人为地制造了落脚城市的门槛,使购房资格成了一种特权,而且当限购政策日渐成为房价上涨可期的旗帜时,限购也就成了滋养权力与金钱交易的温床。Purchase restrictions have been an important administrative intervention for real estate market control. In- depth analysis of "Whom to restrict" and "How to restrict" has indicated that this policy shows clear signs of discriminations and variations. The act hides a power game about transfer of contradictions. It not only jeopardizes the proper demand for housing, and increases the threshold for settling down in urban areas by turning home ownership into a privilege, but also enables the restriction policy on house purchase to become a flag to represent the rising housing price, thus nourishing corruption involving the trade between power and money.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7