精神病犯罪的辩诉交易——GBMI裁定下美国精神障碍犯罪人转处及启示  

GBMI's Decision to Turn the Department and Its Implications for the American Psychiatric Disorder

作　　者：吴鸣 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120 [2]甘肃政法学院公安分院,兰州730070

出　　处：《西南政法大学学报》2017年第4期40-49,共10页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目"特殊群体权利保护与犯罪预防研究创新团队"(22214202013)

摘　　要：美国《模范刑法典》排除基于无意志控制力的精神辩护,但未明确划定刑罚免责事由与减轻事由间的界限。"有罪但存在精神障碍(GBMI裁定)"处于因精神障碍而无罪与有罪判决间的"灰色地带",在GBMI裁定下的精神障碍犯罪人享有包括辩诉交易在内的诉讼权利,其合理性和犯罪人转处具有一定借鉴意义。The model criminal code of the United States excludes the spirit of defense based on no will control,but it does not specify the boundary between the cause of impunity and the cause of relief. ＂Guilty but there are mental disorders（ GBMI） ＂lies in the ＂gray area＂between guilty by reason of mental disorders and the guilty verdict. GBMI affirms that the mental disorder offender enjoys including plea bargaining and litigation rights,and its rationality and the criminal division has certain reference significance.

关 键 词：精神障碍 精神障碍犯罪人 辩护事由 辩诉交易 犯罪人转处 

分 类 号：D919.3[医药卫生—法医学]