检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄忠[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,教授博士生导师重庆401120
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2017年第9期62-73,共12页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:国家社科基金项目(11XFX018);西南政法大学青年教师学术创新团队资助项目的研究成果
摘 要:公法规范与私法规范的协调是民事立法与司法中的一项重要议题。协调好公、私法规范不仅需要具体制度的构建,更需观念更新。绝对化的公、私法二元论认识割裂了公法与私法的关联,而且还会制造公法与私法的抵牾。公法优位论的认识虽可实现部门法律间的一致性,并在一定程度上契合了个人独立责任的法理念,但却不合中国国情,且易损害基本权利的实现。法秩序的统一不能做机械理解,而应基于宪法价值的原点,以实质法秩序之统一的角度进行把握,并在宪法价值以及立法目的范围内,容忍公法判断与私法判断之间所可能出现的差异。《民法总则》第153条在体系上有缺失,在价值上也与中国国情不符,未来民法典应当引入实质法秩序观念,确立协调公私法关系的基本原则。The coordination of public law norms and private law norms is an important issue in the code of civil law. Harmonization of public and private law not only needs to build some specific systems, but also needs to update the concept about the relationship between public law and private law. The dualism understanding about public law and private law not only splits the relation, but also creates the contradiction between them. The superiority theory of public law can realize the consistency of law and conform to the idea of individual independent responsibility, but it does not conform to the situation of China and realize the realization of basic rights. The unity of the law order cannot be understood rigidly, but should be understood inorder to the unity of the substantive law order based on the constitutional value, and tolerate the possible difference about the judgment between public law and private law. Article 153 of the General Principles of Civil Law is lacking in the system and does not conform to the conditions in China. The future civil code should introduce the concept of substantive law order and establish the basic principles of coordinating the relationship between public and private law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249