检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘君博[1] Liu Junbo;
出 处:《台湾研究集刊》2017年第4期35-43,共9页Taiwan Research Journal
基 金:"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金";"中央财经大学科研创新团队计划"资助
摘 要:第三人撤销之诉程序是我国台湾地区"民事诉讼法"整体性修改中重要的制度设计之一。在新法实施后,台湾地区民诉法学界和司法界对于第三人撤销之诉适格原告的判断标准、客体要件、审理及救济程序等具体制度的解释适用问题进行了诸多有益探索和研讨,但尚未形成共识。全面考察台湾地区第三人撤销之诉具体制度要件安排的理论依据和司法实务判断标准对深入理解台湾地区"民事诉讼法"解释论研究的发展路径具有现实意义。The procedure of the challenge of third-party's judgment is one of the important system designs in the overall amendment of Civil Procedure Law in Taiwan. Right after the implementation of the new law( 2003),the civil procedure and judicial circles have made many useful explorations and discussions on the interpretation of the specific regulations such as the judgment criterion,objective elements as well as the trial and remedy procedures for a qualified plaintiff concerning the revocation of the third person judgment,but have not yet reached a consensus so far. Therefore,a comprehensive examination of the theoretical basis and judicial practice criterion in the element arrangement of the specific system concerning the challenge of the third party judgment in Taiwan is of practical significance to the in-depth understanding of the development in the study of the interpretation theory of Taiwan "Civil Procedure Law".
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.28.3